d3ad social login

[d3ad]

tags labelled 'cgi' e

please login to post
@barray on Thu Feb 17 10:19:02 UTC 2022 said: &e
The #tv #show #almosthuman was borderline good. The #cgi went from amazing to crap and the #storyline was all over the place. It really has potential, but I'm not entirely sure how they will get it out. Fingers crossed #season 2 is better...
@barray on Mon Feb 14 13:31:55 UTC 2022 said: &e
Watched the first #episode of #almosthuman - it's not too bad, a little #us #racially charged, but not too much so far. The #premise is really cool, the #cgi is a little lazy, but it's got legs. As long as they don't start getting too #political it could be really cool #tv #series .
@barray on Sat Dec 25 22:47:03 UTC 2021 said: &e
Madness the #hoops the #cgi people have to jump through! https://youtube.com/watch?v=2OEwbocwYF8
@barray on Tue Jul 27 13:15:15 UTC 2021 said: &e
That's awesome, #lucasfilms have hired #shamook , a #youtube creator that uses #deepfakes to fix famous films , to work on #starwars https://www.theverge.com/2021/7/26/22595.. Looking forward to some better #cgi in Star Wars films in the future!
@barray on Sun Jul 25 19:34:38 UTC 2021 said: &e
Personally had some experience with #cgi scripting, and all I can say is that it is slow as balls: https://landchad.net/cgi.html I've had much better experience with just using #nginx as a #reverseproxy to some #java #server running locally (exactly the configuration of this server). Currently the back-end can process a request in less than 1ms (ignoring other latencies). CGI on the other hand eats CPU and RAM for breakfast. The only saving grace is the #cache it can generate.